Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods

Identifieur interne : 006A36 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 006A35; suivant : 006A37

Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods

Auteurs : Raymond Richmond [Royaume-Uni] ; Iain A. Pretty [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract:  Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000F42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002986</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002986</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-1198:2007:Richmond R:denture:marking:patient</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:18093064</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001F63</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001F63</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001F63</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-1198:2007:Richmond R:denture:marking:patient</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006B44</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">006A36</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">006A36</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">52</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1338">1338</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="1342">1342</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-11">2007-11</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional information</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental health unit</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture Identification Marking (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture Identification Marking (methods)</term>
<term>Denture identification</term>
<term>Dentures</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Fitting surface</term>
<term>Forensic dentistry</term>
<term>Forensic odontostomatol</term>
<term>Forensic sciences</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Light cure resin</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mark dentures</term>
<term>Metal band</term>
<term>Miniaturization</term>
<term>Onion skin</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Photographic slide</term>
<term>Pmma strip</term>
<term>Predrilled hole</term>
<term>Preferred method</term>
<term>Radio</term>
<term>Rfid transponder chip</term>
<term>Skelton house</term>
<term>Tissue paper</term>
<term>Various methods</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Marquage pour identification de prothèse dentaire ()</term>
<term>Marquage pour identification de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Miniaturisation</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Radio</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Denture Identification Marking</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Denture Identification Marking</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional information</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental health unit</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture identification</term>
<term>Dentures</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Fitting surface</term>
<term>Forensic dentistry</term>
<term>Forensic odontostomatol</term>
<term>Forensic sciences</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Light cure resin</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mark dentures</term>
<term>Metal band</term>
<term>Miniaturization</term>
<term>Onion skin</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Photographic slide</term>
<term>Pmma strip</term>
<term>Predrilled hole</term>
<term>Preferred method</term>
<term>Radio</term>
<term>Rfid transponder chip</term>
<term>Skelton house</term>
<term>Tissue paper</term>
<term>Various methods</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Marquage pour identification de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Miniaturisation</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Radio</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Abstract:  Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Angleterre</li>
<li>Grand Manchester</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Manchester</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de Manchester</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<region name="Angleterre">
<name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A36 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 006A36 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8
   |texte=   Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022